Date: 2007-08-09 03:04 pm (UTC)
I think I am one of he few people on my flist who really doesn't care. American case law shows that pornographic images or text about underaged participants are actionable whether the participants are real minors or just imaginary. So if a company just doesn't want to go there, I don't see the problem.

The fact that I find pornography about people younger than my daughter repugnant in the extreme doesn't help either, I suppose.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

autographedcat: (Default)
autographedcat

February 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314151617 1819
20212223242526
2728     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 05:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios