Maybe it's just me...
Apr. 23rd, 2004 03:51 pmI don't want to suggest in any way that the honour and attention being afforded Pat Tillman's death in Afghanistan is in any way unearned. And I should not be surprised that our celebrity-driven culture latches onto a story in which a "name" is involved.
But I sat at lunch and idly watched as Fox News talked about nothing but Tillman's death. For an hour. With commentary from a variety of journalists and pundits, and a conversation with his old college roommate and a variety of lauds and repeated reference to the multi-million dollar contract that he walked away from in order to join the Army.
And he should be commended for that, to be sure.
But....every single man and woman who has died in the service of this country deserves just as much attention. Every single soldier in our military is someone's son or daughter, someone's brother or sister, someone's mother or father, someone's boyfriend or girlfriend or husband or wife. Every single one of them volunteered to go into harms way in the service of their country.
Over 700 US soldiers (and another 100 UK and other coalition forces) have died in Iraq alone over the last 13 months. Every single one of them was as much a hero. Every single one of them. Why don't each of them get their hour of television? Why don't we know each and every one of their names as well as we know the name of Pat Tillman?
Maybe I'm just cynical, and maybe I'm just plain wrong, but somehow the whole spectacle that's being made of Tillman and his sacrifice leaves me with a sour taste in my mouth.
But I sat at lunch and idly watched as Fox News talked about nothing but Tillman's death. For an hour. With commentary from a variety of journalists and pundits, and a conversation with his old college roommate and a variety of lauds and repeated reference to the multi-million dollar contract that he walked away from in order to join the Army.
And he should be commended for that, to be sure.
But....every single man and woman who has died in the service of this country deserves just as much attention. Every single soldier in our military is someone's son or daughter, someone's brother or sister, someone's mother or father, someone's boyfriend or girlfriend or husband or wife. Every single one of them volunteered to go into harms way in the service of their country.
Over 700 US soldiers (and another 100 UK and other coalition forces) have died in Iraq alone over the last 13 months. Every single one of them was as much a hero. Every single one of them. Why don't each of them get their hour of television? Why don't we know each and every one of their names as well as we know the name of Pat Tillman?
Maybe I'm just cynical, and maybe I'm just plain wrong, but somehow the whole spectacle that's being made of Tillman and his sacrifice leaves me with a sour taste in my mouth.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 01:06 pm (UTC)From what I have read of Tillman, I don't think he'd approve of the way his death has been covered, but that's just speculation on my part.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 01:27 pm (UTC)And yes, I think that if we asked WWPS :-P the answer would likely be "I was just doing what I had to do. I was one of the guys, and they ALL deserve the same recognition." Too bad we can't get O'Reilly and
Flacksto acknowledge that.no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 01:35 pm (UTC)A fair point. Yeah, it's Fox News, and I shouldn't expect more from them. CNN's web page seems to have the same sort of splash coverage, though their actual text may be toned down.
I wouldn't EXPECT the BBC to make as big a deal of it. Partly becuase the Brits don't seem to be quite as celebrity driven as we are, and partly becuase even if they were, this guy wasn't a celebrity internationally or in the UK, so he's not really going to be more than a human interest story, and hardly the stuff of front page headlines.
But since my rant was really more about the media coverage's tone, it's fair to lay most of the blame on Fox.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 01:18 pm (UTC)I'm not sure I agree with the basic principle; I've read Housman. I have a solid admiration for people who take a job they know runs a risk of death and do it well and without complaint because that is their job. And frankly, I am a little dubious about most people fanatical enough to go die for a principle (though I did attempt to join the military at about the same time and for the same reasons Tillman did; got rejected on medical grounds). So I'm inclined to come to the same conclusion you do, but I can understand why some people see it differently.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 01:28 pm (UTC)Becuase that's what was on the TV in the restaraunt where
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 01:57 pm (UTC)Yes, we should remember every one of them. Like we should remember every person who died in Korea, Vietnam, WWII, WWI, and any other place soldiers have given their lives.
I don't know if I can agree with the "mercenary" comment. Mercenaries are a very specific type... soldiers in the Army do get paid, but they are not mercenaries. And there are many MANY people in the military who are there because they feel it is the right thing to do, not because they got money for college. I find no problem in financially rewarding those who are willing and able to serve. Considering what their job is, they are grossly underpaid.
Let's remember all of our fallen sailors, airmen, soldiers and marines. I salute them for their sacrifice - May they rest in peace.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 02:00 pm (UTC)From what I read in the NY Times' coverage of this, the Pentagon has not acknowledged Tillman's death. So perhaps it's worth noting that our government would like to pretend no actual person is dying in these wars. There are no coffins, there are no dead people, there are just statistics.
So as over-the-top as the coverage is and will be - the NFL Draft will turn into the weirdest thing now, and have absolutley no snese of persepctive at all - it beats the alternative of every more lack of info from the Pentagon.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 02:06 pm (UTC)they can't by law until 24 or 48 hrs (i forget) after the death.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 02:12 pm (UTC)Bush's blackout of any coffin images also rubs me the wrong way. It's like this covert "shadow war" we're fighting and we're not seeing the reality, or the aftermath, of this war. Obviously I wasn't around during WW II or Korea, and was too young to follow and understand the Vietnam war at the time, so I don't know what was done in past wars. As morbid as it sounds, I do like the idea of a tote board showing the number of dead and wounded.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 02:44 pm (UTC)I'm glad those pictures finally made their way into places people can see them. I saw nothing crass or distasteful (or individually identifying in the ones I've seen) in them, in spite of politico protestations about the justifications for the ban.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 07:08 pm (UTC)Maybe somewhat scary that that sounds appealing...
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 07:36 pm (UTC)Speaking of presidential rodentia, you have seen this, yes?
no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 12:50 pm (UTC)::helpless laughter::
Y'know, I'd buy the "Kerry is my hamster" t-shirt if the "I'd vote for a hamster if I thought it would get Bush out of office" part was in large print, too. As it is, the bumper sticker's tempting...
Kerry alarms me a bit, but Bush is freaking frightening. When choosing between two evils, I always like to try the one I haven't tried before...
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 07:34 pm (UTC)And further, I gather it wasn't enforced until an order came down just before the invasion of Afganistan.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 02:52 pm (UTC)(*blush* Be gentle - I don't have a TV, and sometimes things are slow to get into the newspaper here...)
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 03:05 pm (UTC)Is Pat Tillman more of a hero than the other soldiers who have died in Afghanistan or Iraq? Absolutely not.
Is he more of a hero than LeBron James, Ray Lewis or Roger Clemens? Absolutely.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 10:34 pm (UTC)However, as my mother pointed out earlier, very few people thought AIDS was a threat until Rock Hudson died.
Perhaps a Name is what we need to bring it home. If the death of a Name is what it takes to make the American people stand up and say Stop This Now, then I will not only accept but even promote the media coverage of that death.
For the same reason, I disagree with the government's decision to ban all photographs of military coffins. A little number at the bottom of the evening news is abstract, and means nothing. The realization that there are people in those boxes means so much more, and I think the government knows that.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-23 11:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-24 03:25 am (UTC)"It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder"
"I made one great mistake in my life... when I signed the letter to President Roosevelt recommending that atom bombs be made" Albert
no subject
Date: 2004-04-25 09:45 am (UTC)