autographedcat: (Default)
[personal profile] autographedcat
I don't want to suggest in any way that the honour and attention being afforded Pat Tillman's death in Afghanistan is in any way unearned. And I should not be surprised that our celebrity-driven culture latches onto a story in which a "name" is involved.

But I sat at lunch and idly watched as Fox News talked about nothing but Tillman's death. For an hour. With commentary from a variety of journalists and pundits, and a conversation with his old college roommate and a variety of lauds and repeated reference to the multi-million dollar contract that he walked away from in order to join the Army.

And he should be commended for that, to be sure.

But....every single man and woman who has died in the service of this country deserves just as much attention. Every single soldier in our military is someone's son or daughter, someone's brother or sister, someone's mother or father, someone's boyfriend or girlfriend or husband or wife. Every single one of them volunteered to go into harms way in the service of their country.

Over 700 US soldiers (and another 100 UK and other coalition forces) have died in Iraq alone over the last 13 months. Every single one of them was as much a hero. Every single one of them. Why don't each of them get their hour of television? Why don't we know each and every one of their names as well as we know the name of Pat Tillman?

Maybe I'm just cynical, and maybe I'm just plain wrong, but somehow the whole spectacle that's being made of Tillman and his sacrifice leaves me with a sour taste in my mouth.

Date: 2004-04-23 01:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redaxe.livejournal.com
What about some of the not-usually-as-tawdry media (BBC, NPR)? Have you checked out their coverage yet?

And yes, I think that if we asked WWPS :-P the answer would likely be "I was just doing what I had to do. I was one of the guys, and they ALL deserve the same recognition." Too bad we can't get O'Reilly and Flacks to acknowledge that.

Date: 2004-04-23 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] autographedcat.livejournal.com
What about some of the not-usually-as-tawdry media (BBC, NPR)? Have you checked out their coverage yet?

A fair point. Yeah, it's Fox News, and I shouldn't expect more from them. CNN's web page seems to have the same sort of splash coverage, though their actual text may be toned down.

I wouldn't EXPECT the BBC to make as big a deal of it. Partly becuase the Brits don't seem to be quite as celebrity driven as we are, and partly becuase even if they were, this guy wasn't a celebrity internationally or in the UK, so he's not really going to be more than a human interest story, and hardly the stuff of front page headlines.

But since my rant was really more about the media coverage's tone, it's fair to lay most of the blame on Fox.

Profile

autographedcat: (Default)
autographedcat

February 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314151617 1819
20212223242526
2728     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 28th, 2026 02:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios